Linked conversation about the compulsory licensing, flat fee via ISP solution to music piracy:

4/14/03:

Fred Von Lohmann, “New music rules are needed.” DailyPrincetonian Opinion Column. http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2003/04/14/opinion/7930.shtml

Alexander Payne:

http://www.al3x.net/mt/archives/000129.html

(pointing to Von Lohmann article.)

4/15/03

bIPlog notice regarding article:

http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/biplog/archive/000828.html#000828

Tech Law Advisor:

http://techlawadvisor.blogspot.com/#200153656

(points to Payne 4/14/03 post)

4/16/03:

Derek Slater

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/04/16#a136

(pointed to Von Lohmann article, as well as four posts from Freedom to Tinker, Seth Finkelstein, bricoleur and Slater’s previous notes from 1/03 timeframe on watermarking and compulsory licensing discussions, as well as notes on Professor Terry Fisher’s Stanford CIS talk on the subject)

Alexander Payne:

http://www.al3x.net/mt/archives/000133.html

(points to 4/16/03 Slater post)

Michael Fredric comments to Slater 4/16/03 post and Von Lohmann article:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user=techlawadvisor&comment=200153656#144

4/17/03:

Cory Doctorow responds to Slater with comments:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/comments?u=cmusings&p=136&link=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.law.harvard.edu%2Fcmusings%2F2003%2F04%2F16#a136

Ren Bucholz:

http://www.trubble.com/blog/archives/000079.html

(points to Slater, Payne, Von Lohmann article)

Matt Morse:

http://mattrolls.blogspot.com/2003_04_13_mattrolls_archive.html#92800191

(pointed to Slater – 4/16/03 post, Bucholz, Payne, Von Lohmann article)

4/19/02:

bIPlog:

http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/biplog/archive/000833.html

(points to Slater, Bucholz, Payne, Morse, Von Lohmann article)

JD Lasica:

http://www.jdlasica.com/blog/archives/2003_04_19.html#000394

(points to Felten, Lessig and raises new thread on watermarking)

4/20/03:

Larry Lessig:

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2003_04.shtml#001085

(points to Morse)

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2003_04.shtml#001084

(points to Fisher notes by Slater, Slater posts, Lasica, Felten, Stanford Blogs)

Lasica:

http://www.jdlasica.com/blog/archives/2003_04_20.html#000396

(points to Lessig)

4/21/03:

Copyfight:

http://www.copyfight.org/20030401.shtml#30621

(points to Slater, Lasica, Lessig, bIPlog, Morse, Von Lohmann article)

Prof Fisher responds in Comments to Slater:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/comments?u=cmusings&p=148&link=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.law.harvard.edu%2Fcmusings%2F2003%2F04%2F21%23a148

Slater points to Doctorow, Eisenhart comments:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/04/21#a147

4/22/03:

Copyfight:

http://www.copyfight.org/20030401.shtml#30800

points to Lessig, Jamie Love’s IP Think Tank notes on Compulsory Licensing here:

http://www.nsu.newschool.edu/blur/blur02/user_love.html

Slater:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/04/22#a150

points to biplog post, to Fisher’s book chapters

4/23/03:

Slater:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/04/23#a151

Points to Fisher’s book chapters, Siva Vaidhyanathan

Copyfight:

http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/001433.html

point to biplog, furdlog

Furdlog:

http://msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/index.php?wl_mode=more&wl_eid=267

Points to Slater, biplog, Fisher book.

7/11/03:

William Fischer: (CNET Article) A Royalties Plan for File Sharing

http://news.com.com/2010-1071_3-1024856.html

8/2/03:

Fischer’s latest draft plan for Compulsory Licensing:

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/PTKCha%20pter6.pdf

8/4/03:

Mikael Pawlo: on Fisher’s latest plan, posted on Greplaw:

http://grep.law.harvard.edu/article.pl?sid=03/08/04/0855253&mode=thread

points to Fischer article 7/11/03 on CNET

Slater response to Pawlo on Greplaw comments:

http://grep.law.harvard.edu/comments.pl?sid=1390&cid=956

points to Fisher’s latest draft plan

8/5/03:

Slater: response to Pawlo rebuttal on Fisher’s latest plan and pho list discussion

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/08/05#a300

points to Pawlo/Greplaw post

8/7/03:

Slater reponse to Hodder/Pho comments:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/08/07#a302

Joe Hall comment on Slater’s site:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/comments?u=cmusings&p=302&link=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.law.harvard.edu%2Fcmusings%2F2003%2F08%2F07%23a302

Ernie Miller’s response to Slater:

http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/biplog/archive/000991.html

Slater: rest of Pho discussion on 8/7/03:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/08/07#a306

Von Lohmann, Miller, Slater, Pawlo, Parres, Zisk, Marks, Krimm, Wattles, Lincoff, Schuch discussions

8/8/03:

Frank Field linking to the 8/7/03 discussion:

http://msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/index.php?wl_mode=more&wl_eid=383

8/9/03:

biplog post on Wallenberg/Dhamija DRM paper:

http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/biplog/archive/000996.html

Wallenberg/Dhamija DRM paper:

http://sims.berkeley.edu/~fredrik/research/papers/EvaluatingDRM.html

8/26/03:

Lessig post on Record Companies arguing for CompLic in Congress in 1967:

http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/001444.shtml

Copyfight, Palfrey, Furdlog point to this Lessig post.

9/8/03:

Ernie Miller:

http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1190

Derek Slater points to Miller:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/09/08#a332